


Quality of Life is a term that is widely used as an intuitively understood preference for one situation over another, often based on valid accumulated wisdom, but seldom defined quantitatively or even qualitatively, and hardly ever dimensioned or scaled, as working scientists expect their concepts to be.
Energy, for example, is clearly defined for physical sciences with elegant rules for its conversion and transmission, while the softer Para¬normal, Behavioral and Mind-spirit developers abound with all sorts of energies from chi to personally emitted aura and even bodily mental energy.
To get Quality of Life going as a quantitative, useful concept with a rapidly growing utility, we need two things; an attractive, etymologically honest name, and a start-up set of algorithmic principles and concepts, inviting extension and popular understanding.
I suggest Santosha Index as a name. It has honest Sanskrit meaning: the best of all possible situations, joys and experiences, it has a universally recognized nice sound, and is free of the association with drug or other bad happiness that now plagues its Greek equivalent Euphoria.
I can offer a family of Biomimetic elements for incorporation into the Santoshn Index Strategy. These I can only list in this brief abstract.