These were originally submitted to the original website about Otto Schmitt
maintained by HKN honor society at the University of Minnesota.
Otto by Otto
Since 1935 my scientific efforts, while widely diversified and often multidisciplinary,
have almost always had within them an element of what is now being called
Biomimetic Science and Technology. I am confident that a major new quantitative
life-based science is emerging which directly, rather than indirectly,
seeks its algorithmic mathematical foundations, its discoveries and its
analogical applications by emulation of life principles accessible to
us via perceptive consciousness insight, rather than by second or third
generation laundering through conventional physics, chemistry or other
physical sciences that often lead us to conflicting and confusing images
of thought. Early applications of this Biomimetic thinking were productive:
the cathode (emitter) follower circuit; the differential amplifier; the
differentiator and integrator circuits; the computer rotatable three-dimensional
stereoscopic cathode ray presentation; the heat pipe; the H transforms
and the negative and positive resistance, inductance, capacitive synthesis
methods, to name a few. More recently the theory and application of vector
point function Transfer Impedance principles to Vector Cardiology has
given us the tools of Stereovectorelectrocardiology and so-called focussed
Bioelectrode arrays. A family of Biomimetic sensory transducers, including
Thermodes and Filar electrodes, is springing up. The emergence of Bivalent
Logic computer designs as well as the newer concepts of Interpenetrating
Domain Topology for computation and control, offer high promise for the
Artificial Intelligence field. Currently, designs and instrumentation
are developing for phase-lock-loop control and measurement in humans and
in medical imaging with promise for Biofeedback and Feedforward Therapy.
The Whole Life Personally Portable Medical Record is becoming available;
multivariate strand epidemiology for optimized diagnosis and therapy;
the new technology of quality of life characterization by Santosha index
and its enhancement utilizing mental reprogramming techniques are under
investigation. Intriguing insights into advanced health concepts are emerging
through our participation in the Archaeus Project and the informal MIT,
Harvard, Minnesota higher mind-brain modeling studies...
Otto H. Schmitt
Supplied by Ken Young
Young Family Archives

The Psychic Boom
by Otto Schmitt
We are all very familiar with the load and even destructive "boom"
that occurs when an aircraft or missile moves through the air faster than
the speed of sound, pushing the air aside and leaving a void which the
air rushes from all sides and collides with itself, creating an impact
that can be heard for miles. Why has no one looked for the analogous miniature
"boom" that should occur if telekinetic phenomena do indeed
cause physical objects instantly to appear, disappear, or move by some
finite distance?
Does the appearing object move the air out of its way before taking the
place of the air? If so even a pencil- or spoon-size void would make a
loud bang. Does the object materialize among the air molecules and have
to "digest" them? This would be hard for even the most extraordinary
of solid metallic objects to accomplish and would require infinite accelerations
and associated forces.
Short of accepting an hypothesis of aerodynamics (or hydrodynamics when
the object is under water), how can we intelectually allow psychically
induced motions to occur with a minimal fracturing of the laws of physics?
If we consider the perceptive imagery built out of visual or auditory
or other biologically received information as being projected, so to speak,
onto the mind's imaging screen, then these images become the reality we
recognize. Telekinetic and other unfamiliar paranormal experiences, then
may exist as reality in the domain of imaged perception as an alternative
to existing in the physical world; thus they are indistinguishable from
other reality. This raises new problems, but allows us to seek out the
"psychic boom" as one of many examples of first-order evidence
that there is another working model of reality.
From "Artiflex", the journal of the Archaeus Project, Vol. 5,
No.2 (May 1986)
Submitted by Dennis Stillings

Otto H. Schmitt - Advisor and Friend
by John J. Almasi, Ph.D. U of M 1972
March 15, 1998
I had a special and somewhat unique relationship with Otto Schmitt as
I was his graduate student but also his friend. I had gotten acquainted
with him before I came to Minnesota as he had befriended my family through
some consulting work he did for my father. Otto and Viola would stay at
our house as they went back and forth to the Gordon Conferences in New
England during the summers in the early 1960's. As I considered where
to go to graduate school I seriously considered Minnesota but was a bit
intimidated since Otto often asked me questions I couldn't answer. But
finally I decided on his laboratory since I figured that I would really
learn a lot there even though I knew it wouldn't be easy.
Otto had a wonderful ability to clearly separate his roles as my advisor
and friend. Thus he could be a hard taskmaster and find many faults with
my latest research data and have me redo the analysis one minute, but
when I asked him for some help the next minute with my car he would seamlessly
take off the advisor hat, put on his friend hat, and help me with advice,
or roll up his sleeves and rescue me. The dual roles were mutually understood
and I never tried to get special treatment as a student by leveraging
the friendship, perhaps because I knew that Otto's integrity would never
permit this.
This dual relationship was very special to me - this allowed me to learn
Biophysics but also allowed me to have a friend and father figure far
from my home in New York. It made for some precious experiences and conversations
together. In fact he and Viola "got me to the church on time"
in their Jeep Wagoneer for my wedding in Springfield, IL on a freezing
day om 1972. Of course they could not help teasing me in the throes of
my last minute jitters.
When I finished my postdoctoral appointment and took the job with GE Medical
Systems in 1973, I wrote him and Viola a letter thanking for all they
had done for me on both the professional and personal fronts. Even though
I have stayed in touch with them over the years, now that they are both
gone I'm really glad that I wrote that letter to explicitly thank them!
Submitted by John J. Almasi

March 15, 1998
My Otto Story
by William E. Davies
Though I had been to many meetings over the years where Otto was present
and we had exchanged a few words on a number of occasions, it was not
until one evening after the speaker had concluded his talk at a meeting
of the Minneapolis Theosophical Society and we had put out chairs in a
circle to further discuss the topic of the evening that for the first
time I heard Otto speak of length and express his views. At that moment
I knew that the man I had shied away from was a man with an open mind.
He was someone I could talk to.
When the discussion was over I went across the circle to him and told
him what I thought of his comments. He came alive. We continued talking
until they had to close the building. Before we parted, he invited me
to his office the next day for a half hour session. That half hour session
turned into 4 hours and ended with an invitation to join his class. That
invitation extended out for 3 years during which time, I an architect
who knew absolutely nothing about biophysics, met graduate students from
all over the world, physicians, heart surgeons, research scientists, the
head of the department of Health and Human Services from Washington, and
whenever there was a lecture Otto planned to attend, I was invited to
go along.
One time I asked him why he wanted me, an architect, in his classes: He
left it for me to figure out. When I proposed that it was because I had
broken out of the mold and therefore thought differently and had a different
approach to problem solving and that he wanted them exposed to me, he
did not disagree.
He thought enough of me to invite me to teach a class while he went off
to Washington. The subject: "How to go to lectures while you are
asleep." His wonderful lovely wife, Viola, sat in. Later someone
would tell me what an honor that was to have a member of the Manhattan
project attend my lecture. Everyone in the class bought the book I recommended,
THROUGH THE CURTAIN, by Dr. Viola Neal. Otto also ordered a copy though
I suspect he knew all about going to classes while he was asleep since
over the years he had contacted colleagues around the world while he was
asleep.

A few days after Viola had moved on to another dimension, a friend and
I invited Otto to lunch. Because the four of us had become close friends
who could share openly our experiences in the paranormal, Otto told us
about waking up in the middle of the night to find Viola in his arms where
she had always been when they were together. He went on to tell us that
he had spent the previous evening talking with Viola at the dinner table.
After this final goodbye, Otto was not the same man. We tried holding
classes to keep him occupied sharing his ideas, but he was content to
let others talk.
Finally it became necessary for him to retire to a nursing home. Friends
and I would visit him regularly during the years he spent in the different
nursing homes. He would joyfully open his arms and say to the members
of the staff who were present, "These are very special people that
you have got to meet."
Because of his long time friend and colleague, Frank Meyer, I was fortunate
enough to be there at the nursing home with Frank the morning of the day
of Otto's transition later that evening.
I shall always be grateful for those years of friendship I shared with
both Viola and Otto.
Submitted by William E. Davies
Memories
by Edith C. DeClue
When we were little I remember how much Uncle Otto liked Grandpa (his
father) *Dust Janes?*. And he used to enjoy coming for Christmas every
year. Our Grandma looked forward to him being with the family.
He had one room in the building which was called "Uncle Otto's Room".
There he did experiments and other things scientists did.
Later he and Aunt Viola used to call my mom every Sunday. She loved to
talk and listen to him. After she passed away in Oct. 1992, the called
me every Sunday. We talked about what they had done that week and were
going to do the next week and asked me what I was doing. He really enjoyed
to shop and he loved to cook. He told me what his favorite foods were.
He also told me I should take Vitamin E as he did, which I still do.
And I remember that sad Sunday morning when he called and told me that
he had found Aunt Viola had passed away during the night, March 1994.
We cried together, he still continued to call me. I knew he would be lost
without her.
I sure do miss him and his calls. He was a very brillian and kind man.
I'm thankful he was my Uncle Otto.
Submitted by Edith C. DeClue

Remembering Otto Schmitt
Otto Schmitt will be best remembered for his "accomplishments",
however, they do not represent his greatest value to the world. Underlying
all of what we have 'seen' of Otto is his unique way of thinking, or more
accurately, his extreme depth of unders tanding of great varieties of
things that he could relate to each other.
He chose to look for 'connections' between things the rest of us have
no reason to notice. We need 'reasons' to notice - Otto did not. He noticed
what was! He was unhindered by our usual judgements about what was 'important'.
Otto looked for 'importance' on a much higher level. His interest was
in the greater reality, in the most inclusive sense. We, on the other
hand, spend most of our effort in separating everything from all else
and from its own components.
Therefore we 'understand' the pieces but seldom see much of a 'picture'.
Complete pictures are the province of those rare people, like Otto, who
look far beyond existing ideas, with a very open mind. Otto left 'ideas'
on his desk to be 'stolen' by ap propriate people because he had no time
or interest in the physical development process other than to instigate
it. He is the only Absolute-Altruist I have known.
His purpose was to broaden everyone's horizon to become aware of the exceptional
talents and abilities in each individual. Schools do this very poorly.
Otto missed high school because he was invited to study with Pavlov in
Russia and with the German scientific scholars, who took him into their
homes to teach him what no one else could understand.
He learned as a child that none of us ever think in the same Thought-Figures
as anyone else. He called this "Message-Code-Duality" - we don't
realize how poorly we communicate because we foolishly think that we think
alike. So, we ask each other for acknowledgment, right?
He was a point of contact for the University for people with para-psychological
skills. He thought it a natural skill for in his childhood he encountered
these events as a normal, but unexpected feature of his life.
For instance, we have many electrical devices that measure physical functions,
but some people have greater sensitivity to this action than others. Otto
was an instrumental developer of Magneto-Cardiography, the sensing of
heart functions by their magnetic (vs. electrical) activity.
After he invented the Navy's magnetic anomaly detector for finding submarines
via their effect on the Earth's magnetic fields, he helped develop 'de-Gaussing'
equipment to reducing the inherent magnetic signatures of steel ships.
He deeply understood the greater aspects of the medical field, including
many highly effective types of Complementary and Alternative Medicine.
He was more interested in how a frog naturally controls its leaping function
(to land on the right lily pad), than in dissecting the frog to watch
its muscles twitch.
His questions about the leaping frog led to questions about 'feedback'
information to control the impact point... which led Otto to questions
about an electrical circuit that might duplicate the functions... which
led to the differential amplifier (op- amp) that is the basis for all
fidelity in communication and thousands of other applications.
This is the key point: Otto thought from the 'outside-in' - we usually
do the opposite. We take things apart to find out how they work. Otto
related things to other things, and asked why they bothered to worked.
He looked for the Purposeful- Relationship of everything to everything
else.
Submitted by Bill Laittre

Eulogy of Professor Otto H. Schmitt
A valued community member, Professor of Biophysics, Dr. Otto H. Schmitt,
for many years a University of Minnesota faculty member, technology inventor
and splendid teacher of biology and ethics, has died January 5, 1998 in
Roseville, Minnesota.
Otto Schmitt has been an honest, ambitious, yet humble, a courageous and
loving private and public person of infinite inherent human worth. Through
his previously deceased wife of more than half a century, Viola, Otto
understands each ethical person, whether man or woman, is not less than,
but rather is independent and inherently equal in human worth to the whole
of humankind. Thus, he has understood that the proper part of humankind,
the private person, is under the governance of ethical as well as physical
laws; that virtue is its own reward; that virtue is not a burden, but
a challenge to expand to the full circle of the universe and to have no
preferences but those of spontaneous love.
Professor Otto Schmitt will be well remembered for his many inventions
and teaching accomplishments, including his having been among the first
as yet few authentic scientists and moralists, supporting the reciprocal
system of physical and metaphysical theory and practice, originated by
the deceased engineer and author of Beyond Space and Time, Dewey B. Larson.
According to Mr. Larson, the structure of the physical universe as a whole
is entirely finite and, in particular, motion and space-time are identical
and quantised or finitely divisible, rather than unrelated and continuous.
According to Mr. Larson, the physical universe exists to make possible
life of humankind, animals, and plants. Humankind is not a mere incident
or accident of the physical. Human life requires the material and cosmic
sectors, the two physical sectors of our existence, in which to develop
and grow young bodies and minds. In this contingency we remain under the
governance of the laws of physics, but this is not all. Our end is not
in the physical. Human existence also inhabits a Third Non-Physical Sector
Beyond Space and Time. The infinite soul and human spirit of each private
person is under the governance of a moral code, whose laws it is the business
of the science of ethics to explore and discover.
It appears evident to us because it is evidently true, as professed by
our 1776 Declaration by the representatives of the United States of America
in general Congress assembled, that all private persons, whether woman
or man, are designed infinite, independent and inherently equal in death.
Nothing so natural, universal and necessary as human death can possibly
have been designed as an evil by Nature's God, S{he}.
Frank H. Meyer Winfred J. Duffy-Meyer
Life Members, University of Minnesota Alumni Association

First Impressions
by Tom O'dea
I first met Otto in the summer of 1977 when I was asked by the U of MN.
Hospital to help commission the clinic building, the Philips-Wangensteen
(unit B/C) building. One problem area was the EKG area, an area that Otto
had been interested in. Instead of using RF mesh, solid plates had been
used for shielding, a method I had never seen before. I called Otto and
asked to see him to talk about this. He was as many have mentioned, very
cordial, and he invited me over to his *"Quonset Hut"*.
What an experience! First I met Viola, who took my "mug shot"
and entered me in Otto's Log Book! Otto greeted me and sat me facing a
WWII vintage radar controlled 5 in. naval gun (I recognized it from my
service days). We got into a spirited discussion about the very low frequency
naval communication facility for submarines in Wisconsin. As we talked,
I asked him if he placed all of his visitors "under the gun".
He laughed and we resolved our technical issues. We always had a great
time.
I admire Otto's practical application of theoretical principles and I
think it is a legacy of Otto that the U of MN Biophysical Science Department
excels in that area. Otto encouraged my return to school. I visited him
at Lakeridge and still saw a spark of his interest and cordiality.
Submitted by Tom O'Dea
Einstein?
by Harmon Rullifson
The setting was a beautiful summer evening on the lawn of the Bakken Library
Building. It was the "social hour" of a meeting of the Archaeus
Society.
Otto and I were strolling around the lawn engaged in a very deep philosophical
discussion, to which, as usual, I was contributing little.
We sat down on a lawn bench. Again as usual, several people came over
and chimed in. One of them quoted Einstein. Otto abruptly and dead seriously
asked, "Einstein! What is so unique about him?!!"
Submitted by Harmon Ruliffson
All Dressed Up
by Harmon Rullifson
At an Archaeus Society office open house a tool was needed for something.
Otto rifled through his suit coat side pockets and came up with the item.
Everyone mentally noticeed the great quantity of items in those pockets.
Viola was sitting at a table, close by, eating a snack.
I said, "Otto, you must take an hour to dress in the morning!!"
Viola choked, sputtered and guffawed. She said, "You don't know how
how true that is!!
Submitted by Harmon Ruliffson

Three Stories
by Ken Young
I remember being in awe and more than a little afraid of "Uncle Otto's
room." I am a nephew, sixteen years younger than Otto. My mother
Viola was his sister. In 1935, following the death of her husband, she
brought me and four siblings from Buffalo to live with her parents in
St. Louis. I was five years old. We lived upstairs, above the wallpaper
and paint store, warehouse, dentist office and several other rooms. One
of these was know as Otto's room. It was kept closed and always seemed
dark and mysterious. Occasionally he let us inside and there were books,
bottles, gadgets, boxes, and equipment of all kinds from floor to ceiling,
filling the shelves and cluttering the room. One wall had all sorts of
electrical connections fastened there. Otto loved to turn off the lights
and throw a switch. A brilliant bolt of blue, orange and yellow electricity
would then arc and sizzle several feet through the air. We were simultaneously
mesmerized and reminded to stay out of his room when he wasn't there.
A favorite Otto story is his own report of an adventure of his under the
kitchen table when he was eight years old. (I had my own adventures under
that same table.) He had a "lab" there. His brother, Frank,
ten years older, had talked about stimulating muscles by electricity.
A family acquaintance occasionally brought rabbits for the family's dinner
table. A relative would skin them and leave them on the table for the
housekeeper to prepare and cook. Carrie Schnell was her name. Otto had
obtained an auto spark coil and rigged up a wire connection to one of
the rabbit carcasses. Unsuspecting Carrie came into the room. Otto pushed
the key and made the connection. The rabbit jumped and so did Carrie!
In early January of 1950 I was completing my fourth year in undergraduate
social work at Washington University. I took a course on Interviewing
that involved conducting an interview with someone who frequently did
interviewing, then writing a report on qualifications, techniques, etc.
Otto and Viola were visiting over Christmas and so I interviewed him.
I still have a copy of my report. He was a helpful as he could be and
impressed me a great deal and gave me all sorts of ideas. My report contains
the following interesting paragraph:
"The thought occured to me during the interview that interviews in
which both people are equally interested in observing the other become
almost a contest and perhaps ridiculous. My thought became a reality soon
afterwards when he commented that many interviewees are a bit sheepish
and giggle in a silly way during the interview. I laughed a little and
as I did, thought that I was doing just what he was talking about. I was
right for he added, "Just like you're doing now." Consequently,
though much of the interview I felt as if I were the one being interviewed."
My report also notes that I "was very conscious of the fact that
I was talking with someone who was by far my superior in intelligence
and experience."
Submitted by Ken Young
Clocks
by Tom Young
Not only did Otto wear two watches, have a pocket full of more pens than
anybody, and bring us strange food from foreign countries, he also had
a talking clock! This clock announced the time on the hour and when you
pressed a button. This amazing piece of technology (come on, I was a kid)
was frequently used as the tiebreaker for the two watches Otto was wearing.
Even though I have since learned you can buy these clocks at Radio Shack,
the magic has still not been lost on me...
Submitted by Tom Young

|